After Nakumatt Holdings Restricted went underneath in 2017, the person tasked with winding it up got down to make as a lot cash from offloading the shell to ease the distress of tons of of collectors owed no less than Sh18 billion.
Current court docket filings by Nakumatt’s administrator Peter Obondo Kahi have revealed how the company mortician acquired a Sh50 million mortgage — as a part of Sh650 million bailout — from Tuskys in a failed revival bid, earlier than promoting property value Sh422 million to a different rival retailer, Naivas.
Mr Kahi has requested the Milimani Excessive Court docket to increase his time period as Nakumatt liquidator to permit the conclusion of no less than 16 court docket circumstances which will go the retailer’s approach and rake in additional billions.
The Sh5.1 billion income might, nonetheless, seem spectacular for a lifeless firm with few property to its title.
Nakumatt collapsed whereas owing no less than Sh18 billion to landlords, banks, suppliers and different establishments that helped it develop into the most important retailer in East and Central Africa by income and department presence.
A superb variety of these collectors are more likely to go dwelling empty-handed after a long time of standing by Nakumatt’s enterprise.
Cut back debt
Mr Kahi was appointed Nakumatt administrator in 2018. After months of push and pull between the retailer and its collectors, the court docket allowed Mr Kahi to wind up Nakumatt and salvage any funds that could possibly be used to scale back its debt.
Learn: Why supermarkets in Kenya are collapsing one-by-one like flies
Court docket filings point out that one in all Mr Kahi’s key targets was to public sale property that Nakumatt needed to its title and had neither been eyed by collectors nor had their possession contested. These included furnishings, computer systems, cupboards, cabinets and some different gadgets.
Mr Kahi employed Tysons Restricted to worth these property, after which engaged Dyer & Blair because the fallen retailer’s transaction advisers.
As at October 17, 2019, Nakumatt had furnishings, fittings and fixtures valued at Sh110 million. The property, nonetheless, had a pressured sale worth of Sh77 million. They had been unfold throughout Nakumatt branches at Status, Lavington, Highridge and Mega in Nairobi. Different property had been in Nakuru and Kisumu.
Dyer & Blair marketed for the sale of the shell that was Nakumatt on varied dates between October and November, 2019.
Learn: Nakumatt collapses after collectors vote for liquidation
Tuskys, Chandarana, Quickmart and Naivas all threw in bids for various property.
Naivas and Chandarana had been the one two corporations that submitted bids to accumulate all property on sale, at Sh422 million and Sh246 million respectively.
Tuskys solely needed the property in Status, Lavington and Nakuru, therefore it submitted a collective bid of Sh70 million.
Quickmart eyed the Nakuru property, and it bid Sh160 million.
Mr Kahi held that the very best wager was to promote every part to Naivas for Sh422 million. “With this strong, clear and aggressive course of, and upon receiving approvals from the Competitors Authority of Kenya on December 18, 2019, the property, largely furnishings, fixtures and fittings (principally shelving) of Nakumatt Holdings Restricted, have been bought to Naivas. No stock/inventory is included on this transaction,” Mr Kahi says within the report filed in court docket.
Debt collections and sale of autos and a few inventory left on the six Nakumatt branches fetched one other Sh4.725 billion for the collapsed retailer.
Mr Kahi additionally acquired a Sh50 million mortgage from Tuskys in the midst of his administration duties.
The fee was to be a part of a Sh650 million funds injection from Tuskys that may see Nakumatt restock its cabinets and begin strolling alongside the street to restoration.
Tuskys had entered into an association with Nakumatt, the place the previous signed on as a guarantor for the latter’s lease dues to landlords.
The assure had seen Nakumatt strike offers with some suppliers to place their merchandise on the retailer’s cabinets following the Tuskys deal.
On March 7, 2018, the homeowners of Metropolis Mall in Nyali had sufficient of internet hosting Nakumatt, which owed lease relationship again a number of months.
The homeowners forcefully ejected Nakumatt, and a few Nyali residents noticed this as a chance to loot gadgets that had been being faraway from the premises.
Mr Kahi has not given the worth of products looted in the course of the eviction.
After the Nyali incident, Tuskys realised it was coming into a harmful zone with the rental assure deal and determined to again out of it.
Apparently, Tuskys is now in an nearly equally troublesome scenario because it fights off makes an attempt by collectors to wind up its operation over money owed in extra of Sh6.2 billion.
The paperwork Mr Kahi has filed in court docket present the mortgage from Tuskys is but to be repaid, with the retailer having solely Sh41 million to its title.
Mr Kahi’s report additionally reveals that Nakumatt has managed to pay Sh788 million to landlords throughout the nation.
Simply months after Gold Crown Drinks and African Cotton Industries filed insolvency petitions in opposition to Nakumatt, 19 landlords joined the fits claiming Sh600 million.
In its prime, Nakumatt had over 60 branches and the lease defaults had come near Sh1 billion.
Mr Kahi believes that 16 court docket circumstances that Nakumatt has been combating since 2012 may go the retailer’s approach.
Eight of the circumstances contain rental dues Nakumatt owes to Perfect Areas Restricted, Nova Holdings, Acuity Restricted, Sabaki River Holdings and South Coast Holdings. Half of those circumstances are between Nakumatt and Perfect Areas, two of that are earlier than the Supreme Court docket.
Three different circumstances are over land disputes. One case includes the sale of a chunk of land owned by Nakumatt CEO Atul Shah’s son, Harsha, and which had been used as safety for a mortgage from Kenya Business Financial institution to Nakumatt.
The opposite two land disputes pit corporations owned by Mr Shah, Parkview Buying Arcade and Collogne Investments, in opposition to UBA financial institution and KCB respectively.
Two of the circumstances pit Nakumatt in opposition to the Kenya Income Authority, which is claiming a complete of Sh2.3 billion in unpaid levies.
One other case has seen Kenindia problem Nakumatt’s bid to have the insurer pay a lender.